Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: https://secure.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/10321

Posted on 29 September 2010 at 21:55 GMT

No 'lurch to the left' for Labour

Editorial from The Socialist, issue 640
This is no time to foster illusions in New Labour: National Shop Stewards Network Lobby of TUC congress 2010, photo Paul Mattsson

This is no time to foster illusions in New Labour: National Shop Stewards Network Lobby of TUC congress 2010, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

Does the victory of Ed Miliband over his elder brother David - a modern Cain and Abel drama in reverse with the younger brother 'knifing' the elder - represent the dreaded 'lurch to the left' feared by the right-wing press? Many Labour Party members and others hope that it is so.

The voting figures however do not bear this out. Ed Miliband won by a handful of votes; a dozen MPs changing their votes would have made all the difference by securing victory for David.

Underlining the unreconstructed Blairite character of the Labour Party, David was ahead amongst MPs and the 'ordinary' members of the party in the Labour Party branches.

The standard bearer of the left, Diane Abbott, got the support of only seven MPs and even her own local party did not give her a majority of their votes! It was the votes of affiliated trade union members - whipped up by the general secretaries of the big unions in particular - that secured Ed Miliband's hairsbreadth victory.

Yet an examination of the figures shows that this is far from a ringing endorsement amongst ordinary trade unionists for the 'new' Labour leader or the party.

Union leaders

Nor does it vindicate the union leaders' insistence that they must remain affiliated to the Labour Party because trade union members still look towards this party.

Despite the valiant efforts of these leaders, turnout was in general miserable. Only 8.7% of affiliated trade union members bothered to vote! The mountain - in this case right wing trade union leaders - laboured and produced a mouse.

Shop workers' union Usdaw, which backed the elder Miliband, David, to the hilt, achieved a phenomenal turnout of 4.3%! The Unison leaders have spent more time witch-hunting militant fighters in the union's ranks than fighting the cuts.

They argued against the disaffiliation of the union from New Labour. But they achieved just 6.7% turnout with only 28,000 votes cast out of 419,000 ballot papers distributed.

Added to this were the 15% spoiled ballots in the union section. This cannot be explained away by confusion over voting procedure. It indicates most probably a conscious decision by a significant layer to spoil their ballots because none of the candidates reflected their urge for radical socialist policies to meet the challenge of the current devastating economic crisis.

Dismissed left turn

Moreover, within minutes of being elected, Ed Miliband dismissed any idea that he would turn left. Unite joint general secretary Tony Woodley correctly said Miliband was not 'red' but "barely pink"! Also dismissed early was the charge that he is now in hock to the trade unions.

Nothing better illustrates the thorough rightward transformation of the Labour Party than the phobia of the right-wing press and Blairite MPs that the party, which was founded by the trade unions could now be 'controlled' by them.

If only this were the case! Then ordinary working-class people and trade unionists would have a possible route to enter and transform the Labour Party.

Yet even in this election, despite the fact that they are still the party's paymasters, donating millions of pounds every year, the collective voice of the trade unions was dissipated.

They were only able to have a decisive effect on the outcome of the election because of the narrowness of the contest.

Ed Miliband has made it clear that he will not 'fully' support the trade unions in fighting the looming Con-Dem cuts.

New Labour's parliamentary party's opposition will be largely verbal and will not extend to opposing 'all' cuts.

What will this new Labour leadership say to the 26,000 local government workers in Birmingham who have received redundancy warning notices, along with the newly announced 8,500 warned by the Tory-Liberal coalition in Sheffield? Tears and hand-wringing will not be enough.

Paroxysms of bile

Paradoxically, the very terror, indeed the paroxysms of bile, at the remote prospect that Miliband 'may' represent a leftward turn in the Labour Party, is a striking illustration of the explosive social situation developing in Britain now.

The Financial Times pleaded: "Miliband must kill the 'Red Ed' tag."

Editorials are full of warnings that along this road lies 'electoral disaster'. Don't abandon the 'middle ground', go on the so-called 'prawn cocktail offensive' - like Blair and Brown before him - Miliband is advised.

All of this would convince the bosses that 'they can work with him'. This is a backhanded acknowledgement that a real, left, socialist policy would find a huge echo and electoral success.

In his conference speech, Miliband pointed to the loss of five million votes by New Labour since 1997.

But he also 'praised' Brown and Blair, while looking towards an undefined path for the future.

The electoral debacle of New Labour arose from the fact that Blair and Brown carried through their ruthless policy which enormously benefited the rich at the expense of the poor, whose numbers grew during the New Labour governments.

Miliband has now echoed the criticisms made by The Socialist on many occasions that Brown unsuccessfully sought to conjure away the economic cycles of 'boom and bust'.

This was because he was in thrall to capitalism. This economic crisis did not drop from the sky, is not an act of God, but is rooted in the contradictions of capitalism.

Wishful thinking is the most dangerous policy in the kind of crisis confronting working-class people today.

It is fatal to cling to the hope that New Labour, because that is what the party is, despite the blandishments of Miliband, is not still a Blairite pro-capitalist party in its policy, in the social composition of its members and how it is likely to act in this crisis.

Miliband's policy merely proposes making the cuts at a 'slower pace' than the Con-Dem coalition.

Resisted by a mass movement

At local level, Labour councils - unless they adopt the stance of the Liverpool city council of 1983 to 1987 - will become 'little butchers', carrying out the demands of the 'big butchers' in Downing Street.

They will be resisted by a mass movement. Which side will Ed Miliband be on? There will be ladles of 'sympathy' but it will be by his deeds that his leadership and his party will be judged.

Sure enough, for the first time since the election and beyond, even according to the Sun newspaper - New Labour has gone ahead of the Tories in the polls.

This has nothing to do with a change of policy on the part of its new leader. It is a reflex reaction by working-class people, largely on the electoral plane at this stage, to the dire consequences arising from the plans of the 'deficit slashers'.

Therefore the conclusion that all socialists and active trade unionists should draw is that this is no time to foster illusions in New Labour or that there will be a 'change' in its programme and actions in the next period.

On the contrary, this leadership election has highlighted once more the absolute necessity to fight the Con-Dem government, not just on the industrial and social planes, but also the need to provide a clear political alternative.

The basis for a new mass workers' party, the only hope for the millions who fear the cuts about to destroy them and their families, must be created now.

Donate to the Socialist Party

Coronavirus crisis - Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

  • The Socialist Party's material is more vital than ever, so we can continue to report from workers who are fighting for better health and safety measures, against layoffs, for adequate staffing levels, etc.
  • Our 'fighting coronavirus workers' charter', outlines a programme to combat the virus and protect workers' living conditions.
  • When the health crisis subsides, we must be ready for the stormy events ahead and the need to arm workers' movements with a socialist programme - one which puts the health and needs of humanity before the profits of a few.
Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.
We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to donate to our special coronavirus appeal.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation

 

Your message: 

 






Related links:

Labour Party:

triangleWorkers need a new mass party to defend their interests

triangleSocialism Today special issue: Lessons from the Corbyn experience

triangleBlairite general secretary elected - Starmer's takeover of Labour Party consolidated

triangleLessons from the Corbyn experience

triangleHull Trades Council debates workers' political representation

Labour:

triangleSocialist Party Wales: Starmer turns Labour right - Time for a new workers' party

triangleEast London Socialist Party: Labour - time for a new party for the working class

triangleThe best place to start - join the Socialist Party

triangleEnd the scandal of sweatshop labour

Ed Miliband:

triangleFight for a socialist Brexit

triangleLessons of the 'N30' 2011 pension strike

triangleMajority support migrants staying - fight hate crime

Cuts:

triangleNottingham unions fight council job cuts

triangleJohnson blames care workers for deaths

Unions:

triangleWest London Socialist Party: Why young workers need trade unions

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis

8/7/20

Socialism

Fight for every job. Fight for socialism

8/7/20

Care workers

Johnson blames care workers for deaths

8/7/20

Leicester

End the scandal of sweatshop labour

8/7/20

Young people

No choice but to fight the system

8/7/20

Northern Ireland

Covid pandemic and Northern Ireland - workers must resist the bosses' offensive

8/7/20

Green

3bn green pledge: not enough for climate or jobs

8/7/20

Care Homes

No going back: Nationalise social care!

8/7/20

NHS

Tory NHS betrayal

8/7/20

Super-rich

1,600 less benefits if your job goes - while super-rich splash cash

8/7/20

Tories

Testing: Tories' 5bn gift to private sector

8/7/20

BAME

Poverty rises again - especially for BAME workers

8/7/20

Workers

Them and us

1/7/20

Coronavirus

Tory full return to school plans gamble with lives

1/7/20

Trans rights

Yes to self-identity

1/7/20

Waste

Plastic waste ignored

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 075 4018 9052

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999