Link to this page: https://secure.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/810/18563
From The Socialist newspaper, 7 May 2014
Private sector rents and Labour
It's a mad, mad, mad, mad world!
Paul Kershaw, TUSC candidate, Ponders End, Enfield
Labour launched its election campaign with proposals aimed at attracting private renters. There is little detail, but Ed Miliband raises the idea of three-year tenancies, offering tenants a little more security after a six month probation period; a limited restriction on rent increases, and an end to the outrageous fees charged by estate agents.
This doesn't go anywhere near far enough. The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition's (TUSC) call for rent controls and a return to secure tenancies has had a massive echo on the doorstep. Crucially, TUSC also calls for building genuinely affordable council housing with secure tenancies.
The Observer's Andrew Rawnsley, no left winger, commented: "Whether or not the Labour plan is good enough... it looks like a canny bid for votes to offer more protection from exploitative landlords and increased security of tenure. There are about nine million people in private rented accommodation and, on average, their rent consumes nearly half of their disposable income".
There has been a hysterical response from landlords and their representatives, with the Tories comparing Miliband's timid proposal to the radical policies to the late Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Tory London Mayor Boris Johnson warned of 'Mugabe style expropriations', while the Institute of Directors labelled the proposals a 'Stalinist attack on property rights'. George Osborne claimed Miliband had outlined "essentially the argument Karl Marx made in Das Kapital"!
More's the pity! Unfortunately, Labour's protests that it isn't considering a return to 'old style rent control' are all too accurate.
City AM is hostile to the proposals but sober. It points out that they amount to a version of so-called SGRC's (Second Generation Rent Controls) which "...are not really rent controls... They can temporarily decouple the rents paid by incumbent tenants from market rents. But they do not interfere with those market rents themselves."
Timid
The proposals are actually more timid than those advocated by Angela Merkel (the right-wing German chancellor) in last year's elections.
Ian Fletcher of the British Property Federation, noted that many investors were "very receptive to offering longer tenancies". A high turnover of tenants is expensive for landlords to manage, and they are keen to make renting politically acceptable, so they probably think this is a concession worth making to avoid a return to secure tenancies.
The same writer was more concerned about the threat any restriction on rent might mean for profits despite Labour's reassurances. But just a week before the announcement Paragon Mortgages marked the 18th anniversary of the introduction of buy-to-let mortgages by boasting that landlords had made a whopping 16.3% annual return since 1996, dwarfing what they would get from other investments.
Much of landlords' profit comes from housing benefit as the Observer comments: "There is only one word for this: madness." Perhaps it doesn't seem so mad if, like a third of MPs you are a landlord, but Labour's proposals do not address this madness. Even their 'target' of building 200,000 homes a year is less than the number required to keep up with new household formation. And they haven't committed to guaranteeing these are council homes.
The old rent act that gave people secure tenancies and allowed tenants to take landlords to a rent tribunal if they felt they weren't being charged a 'fair rent' is still on the statute books, some people still have pre-1998 tenancies regulated in this way. It wasn't perfect, but it could be reintroduced quickly as an emergency step without any need for new primary legislation.
The benefit cap which drives people to food banks should be immediately dropped. But the key would be a massive programme of building new homes. Instead of the madness of subsidising private landlords to make huge profits out of providing insecure, sub-standard accommodation we need a programme of building public housing.
Many renters may be 'thankful for small mercies' on hearing Labour's proposals but we need TUSC for an alternative to capitalist madness.
Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.
In The Socialist 7 May 2014:
Socialist Party election campaigning
Fight cuts, Back strikes, Vote TUSC
More local news coverage for TUSC, but BBC downplays council elections
Housing crisis: TUSC candidates demand socialist policies
Election appeal 2014 - £4,278 raised so far
Socialist Party feature
Prepare for almighty battles against austerity
International socialist news and analysis
$15: Seattle shows what a movement can achieve
Socialist Party news and analysis
Schools - Would things get better under Labour?
Private sector rents and Labour
Socialist Party workplace news
RMT forces London Underground to back down
Striking against Land Registry cuts
Care UK workers start 14 days of strike action
CWU conference - time to build Broad Left
Socialist Party reports and campaigns
We can scrap zero-hour contracts
No support for zero-hour contracts
RMT turns out in strength for May Day march
May Day rallies in Swansea and Ipswich
Battling the cuts: when push comes to shove
Leeds protest against privatisation of student loans
Home | The Socialist 7 May 2014 | Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe | Donate | PDF | ebook