Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

From The Socialist newspaper, 5 August 2015

Personal care budgets: more choice for service users?

Campaigning to save care homes in Surrey

Campaigning to save care homes in Surrey   (Click to enlarge)

'Personal budgets' for disabled and older people became a reality last year. Supposedly they give service users more choice over their own care. But what is their real effect? Adrian Picton investigates.

So what is a personal budget?

Well, previously local councils would directly provide or commission services such as home care, day care and residential care. They would assess each individual to determine which services they need. Now, the assessment instead entitles you to money to cover your needs.

A personal budget can be made up of direct payments, credit for council-run or commissioned services, or a combination. In theory, this gives a person more say over what they receive, even if they choose to let the council manage it for them.

Having this sort of choice and control about how care needs are met is something the disabled people's movement has fought for over years. The principle is therefore welcome.

The problem is, however, that these changes have come in at a time when local authority finances are being squeezed. Behind the rhetoric of 'choice' and 'control' and 'needs-led services', the reality is that services are being turned into cash cows - or destroyed.

There have been several changes in the eligibility criteria for assessment over the last few years. Charges for care services have been increased, or introduced where they were previously free.

Councils have used the whole 'personalisation' agenda to sell off, reduce or cease altogether their own home care, day care and residential services. This has led to hundreds of redundancies, and reductions in hours, pay and conditions.

It is important that disabled and older people can choose who provides the services they need. But it does not follow that everyone will want to stop receiving them from their local council.

For example, disabled people should ultimately be included in mainstream activities wherever possible. But you can't close a day centre and expect someone who has attended for many years, who has friends there, to simply adjust.

In many cases, day centre closures have led to increased burdens on family carers. Most are women who do this work unpaid. They no longer get a day to themselves to get other jobs done - or just to have some 'me time'.

And in general, older people prefer traditional home care services. They don't want to be bothered with employing their own carers.

The move away from council-run home care means it is provided by private agencies. They pay less, train less and have far worse terms and conditions for staff. This means high turnover. In turn, this means service users have to deal with constant changes of carers coming into their home. Continuity of care is extremely important to older people.

Personal budgets should give people more choice, not tell them they can no longer use a traditional service. By removing such services, councils are actually restricting choice.

Councils which have completely removed in-house services could face further problems. If an agency can't fulfil its commitments, or the relationship between a service user and their personal assistant breaks down, the council ultimately has the duty of care.

The Socialist Party says that greater control over your own care is important, but not enough. We also need full funding for care services. Instead, the demands of disabled people have been stole, and personal budgets have become a clever excuse for cuts and privatisation.

Local authorities should reopen closed services, and bring private services back in house. They should set a 'needs budget' at council level to cover the full cost of all services. This could buy time to mobilise a campaign of trade unionists and service users to win the necessary funding back from central government.

Then personal budgets could give disabled and older people real choice and control.

Where did personal budgets come from?

The concept was introduced in the New Labour government's White Paper "Our Health, Our Care, Our Say" published in January 2006. A handful of local authorities then set up pilots.

Personal budgets were later rolled out across England, and made effectively mandatory through performance targets set by Westminster. Finally, the last Tory-Liberal Coalition government's 2014 Care Act came into force this April, placing a legal duty on councils to provide them for all service users.

Personal budgets are frequently confused with direct payments. Direct payments have been around since the late 1990s. They are a weekly payment for needs such as employing your own carers, or going out for social activities. Part or all of a personal budget can be paid as a direct payment.

Donate to the Socialist Party

Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

  • The Socialist Party's material is more vital than ever, so we can continue to report from workers who are fighting for better health and safety measures, against layoffs, for adequate staffing levels, etc.
  • When the health crisis subsides, we must be ready for the stormy events ahead and the need to arm workers' movements with a socialist programme - one which puts the health and needs of humanity before the profits of a few.
Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.
We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to donate to our Fighting Fund.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation


Your message: 


In The Socialist 5 August 2015:

Socialist Party news and analysis

Jeremy Corbyn: Thousands rally to anti-austerity appeal

Health trusts told 'don't fill posts' - stop NHS cuts!

Abolish the House of Lords!

Police spying: campaigners demand full disclosure

Fiddling finance capital in the dock

Rent hikes make housing unaffordable

Them & Us

Socialist Party features

Human tragedy of Calais crisis

Personal care budgets: more choice for service users?

Socialist history

Hiroshima - 70 years on

International socialist news and analysis

China at a turning point

Workplace news

Kill the bill! Join the NSSN lobby of the TUC

National Gallery strike: all-out art action

Rail shutdowns step up: second tube strike, 72-hour Great Western walkout

National Museum Wales strike against pay cut

Traffic wardens strike for sick pay

Workplace news in brief

Fighting the anti-union laws

Socialist Party comments and reviews

Bath: behind the elegant walls

Socialist Party reports and campaigns

Campaigning to end the housing crisis

Lincoln demonstrators defy far-right threats

TUSC lobbies 'Labstainer'

Thousands gather at Leeds Pride

Socialist Party Summer Camp


Home   |   The Socialist 5 August 2015   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   PDF  |   ebook

Related links:


triangleCapitalism discriminates against us - Disabled people fighting for our rights

triangleNews in brief

triangleTV review: The Hidden Story of Disabled Britain

triangleCripTales: A painful reflection of a system that pits us against each other

triangleDisabled students let down by "rotten education system"


triangleBirmingham Clean Air Zone a tax on the poor

triangleEnfield byelection: We need councillors prepared to resist

triangleNorth London Socialist Party: How can a party for the working class be built?

triangleRight lose control in national executive council election


triangleManagement tells carers PPE would 'worry' residents

triangleSocial care: "Not good enough by miles"

triangleHome carers victory


triangleHands off our NHS

triangleRich pickings for private companies - peanuts for health workers


triangleWomen's health matters


triangleReaders' comments


triangleSocialist Party to the fore at Unison LG conference


triangleGreat British Railways shake-up offers no end to profiteering

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns



Engineers in fourth week of strike action



Conference 2021: Divide between union leaders and rank-and-file exposed



Sparks win victory!



Underpaid, overworked - NHS workers say: 'Enough is enough'



Enfield byelection: We need councillors prepared to resist



Left candidate needed for Unite general secretary election



National finance meeting



Socialist Party to the fore at Unison LG conference



Birmingham Clean Air Zone a tax on the poor



Johnson's G7 hypocrisy



Pandemic homeless



International solidarity protests



Queues at Socialist Party stall in Cov



Majority of BFAWU members vote to break from Labour



Now is the time to fight for the NHS

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: [email protected]

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 075 4018 9052

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 078 0983 9793



Alphabetical listing

June 2021

May 2021

April 2021

March 2021

February 2021

January 2021