Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

From The Socialist newspaper, 7 September 2016

Should socialists give electoral support to the Labour right?

London's new Blairite mayor Sadiq Khan, photo Policy Exchange/Creative Commons, photo Policy Exchange/Creative Commons

London's new Blairite mayor Sadiq Khan, photo Policy Exchange/Creative Commons, photo Policy Exchange/Creative Commons   (Click to enlarge)

Is backing Blairites at elections necessary to defeat the right's lie that Corbyn's Labour is 'unelectable'? A reader wrote a letter to the Socialist's editors raising this important question. The editors respond.

I fully endorse the 'What we think' editorial in issue 913 of the Socialist (see 'Answer right's attacks with firm socialist programme') - with the exception of your comments regarding Momentum.

"Our objections [to Sadiq Khan's selection] were pushed aside by ... the leadership of pro-Corbyn group Momentum." Khan was selected as Labour's candidate for the London mayoral election at the same time as Jeremy Corbyn was elected as leader, last September.

Corbyn and Momentum's support for Sadiq Khan during his election campaign was not simply because a Labour victory is better than a Labour defeat, but also because Khan's defeat would have been an 'endorsement' of the Blairite claim of Labour's unelectability with Corbyn as leader.


Also, Sadiq Khan would have preferred not to have had the full support of Corbyn and Momentum, because he wanted to claim his victory was in spite of Corbyn's leadership. On the other hand, if Momentum had chosen not to fully support Khan's election campaign and he had lost, then Corbyn and Momentum would have been blamed for his defeat because of their lack of support!

If Corbyn and Momentum had raised objections to Sadiq Khan's selection, that could have provided Khan with the opportunity to refuse their active support - a decision that would have been 'erased' in the aftermath of his defeat and the Blairite outrage against Corbyn's leadership.

Consequently I believe Corbyn and Momentum chose to keep quiet about their objections to Sadiq Khan's election and fully support his election campaign.

Therein lies the compromise which deserves to be reported and commented upon. Bearing in mind your issue 907 'What we think' editorial comment on the Tooting byelection: "Labour more than doubled its majority, in what was the fourth byelection it has held comfortably. This again disproves the lie that Labour is unelectable with an anti-austerity leadership" (see 'Left alternative needed to counter austerity, racism and the far right').

John Merrell, Leicester

We welcome John Merrell's letter, because criticism and debate of our ideas in the Socialist hopefully helps to clarify the understanding of our readers and working people generally.

We criticise the leadership of Momentum not for their general support for Khan against the racist Tory Goldsmith in the London mayoral election, but for its uncritical character.

No warnings were issued which even hinted at criticisms of Khan's political position on the right of the Labour Party. On the contrary, Momentum stoked illusions in him by declaring: "Jez we Khan"!

Jeremy Corbyn at Durham Miners' Gala July 2016, photo Paul Mattsson

Jeremy Corbyn at Durham Miners' Gala July 2016, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

This is despite the fact, as we pointed out in advance of his election, that "he would use his position not as a political victory for Labour [and Corbyn] but as a personal victory in opposition to the anti-austerity message of Jeremy Corbyn" (editorial, issue 913).

The anti-Corbyn forces sought to use Khan as a rallying point against the left leadership of Labour. And Khan duly obliged - with his denunciation of Corbyn as an electoral liability, as opposed to himself, while at the same time endorsing Owen Smith.

As John points out, Momentum chose "to keep quiet about their objections to Sadiq Khan's election and fully support his election campaign."

The task of socialists, and particularly Marxists, is "to say what needs to be said and do what needs to be done, come what may".

And this applies not just to Momentum - but also, when required, to the trade union and Labour Party leadership. While generally supportive, we would have some criticisms, which we put forward in a comradely and friendly way.


If this is not done, as was the case of Momentum in relation to Khan, then the labour movement and working class would, in our opinion, be unprepared. We must tell the truth about the inevitable betrayals of the Blairites and pro-capitalist career politicians who seek to shelter under Labour's ideological blanket, which Sadiq Khan clearly does.

When the heroic Butterfields tenants in Waltham Forest, east London, desperately appealed for Khan's help to prevent their eviction by greedy landlords, his office wrote back and said he could not intervene. This despite the fact that in the election campaign he promised to come to the assistance of all those harassed by grasping landlords.

We stand by our comments on the Tooting byelection, which John also quotes. However, we made the same point as we had done in the mayoral election. The victory was primarily the result of the new anti-austerity stance of the Labour leadership and movement around Jeremy Corbyn, but the task of dealing with the right-wing Labour opponents of socialist policies remains.

The editors

Following on from my letter and the editors' response:

I'm now retired, but in my 30 years of advocating the policies of Militant and then the Socialist Party in the labour movement, there were occasions when others on the left would approach me and say: "Privately I agree with you but at this time we have to support this (non-left) candidate or policy."

My letter sought to identify this dichotomy in Momentum's approach to parliamentary byelections and mayoral elections - rather than just "Momentum's uncritical support for Blairite candidates".

This compromise, even if successful, would cause confusion in the ranks of Momentum and miseducate its thousands of new activists.

In this way my letter is not counterposed to the editors' response, which states: "The task of socialists, and particularly Marxists, is 'to say what needs to be said and do what needs to be done, come what may.'" A statement I fully agree with.

I just thought we could have said more about the defensive nature of left reformism, which leads to this dichotomy.

John Merrell

Donate to the Socialist Party

Coronavirus crisis - Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

  • The Socialist Party's material is more vital than ever, so we can continue to report from workers who are fighting for better health and safety measures, against layoffs, for adequate staffing levels, etc.
  • Our 'fighting coronavirus workers' charter', outlines a programme to combat the virus and protect workers' living conditions.
  • When the health crisis subsides, we must be ready for the stormy events ahead and the need to arm workers' movements with a socialist programme - one which puts the health and needs of humanity before the profits of a few.
Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.
We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to donate to our special coronavirus appeal.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation


Your message: 


In The Socialist 7 September 2016:


#KeepCorbyn: build the movement against austerity

Break with Blairites essential to defeat split Tories

Should socialists give electoral support to Labour right?

#KeepCorbyn: reports from the campaign

Socialist Party news and analysis

Apple told to pay 11bn: nationalise all the tax dodgers!

Refugee crisis: for homes, jobs and services for all

Women lose out in the workplace

London bailiff use soars by half

Them & Us

What We Saw

TUC congress 2016

Organise mass working class resistance to austerity

International socialist news and analysis

Brazil: impeachment farce only serves big business

International news in brief

Workplace news and analysis

Junior doctors plan to continue contract struggle

Rail workers fighting back!

Premium pay cuts are not just any cuts, they are M&S cuts

Royal Mail wildcat strike against bullying bosses

Workplace news in brief

Socialist readers' comments and reviews

Letter: back the docs!

Socialism, black liberation and cricket - the life of CLR James

The Socialist inbox

Socialist Party reports and campaigns

Huge turnout in support of Huddersfield NHS campaign

Grantham on the march against 'life and death' cuts to health service

London fighting fund BBQ success


Home   |   The Socialist 7 September 2016   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Audio  |   PDF  |   ebook

Related links:

Labour Party:

triangleWorkers need a new mass party to defend their interests

triangleSocialism Today special issue: Lessons from the Corbyn experience

triangleBlairite general secretary elected - Starmer's takeover of Labour Party consolidated

triangleLessons from the Corbyn experience

triangleHull Trades Council debates workers' political representation


triangle75th anniversary of the Attlee Labour government

triangleCapitalism and corruption go hand in hand


triangleNo retreats: Corbyn must stand firm against Blairites

triangleNorth Tyneside: march to save our footbridge

triangleEngaging book about Corbyn's rise doesn't provide answers on how to change Labour


triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: The US presidential election


triangleBoris's new big deal

Jeremy Corbyn:

triangleSabotage - the inner workings of Labour's political machine exposed


triangleLabour Party leadership contest: Fight for a mass anti-austerity, workers' party with a socialist programme

Labour leadership:

triangleLabour leadership election: Starmer wins but the fight for socialism goes on

Reviews and comments

Reviews and comments



From slavery to Black Lives Matter - racism and capitalist injustice exposed



Readers' opinion


Socialist Party

I left Labour and want to end capitalism - join us in Socialist Party



The Socialist inbox



A timely read about a pandemic that overwhelms society



Tears and anger over the treatment of the Windrush generation


Grenfell Tower

Three years on: No justice for Grenfell, no peace from BLM



Film: Da 5 Bloods - entertaining but politically constrained



Two-metre rule under 'review' - Another case of profit before safety



The Socialist inbox


Socialist Party

Why we joined the Socialist Party



Readers' opinion: Things will never be the same


Socialist Party

Why we joined the Socialist Party



Football in the time of coronavirus - reclaim our game!



Going viral: Socialist comments and letters

triangleMore Reviews and comments articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777


Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 07748 534 891

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041



Alphabetical listing

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020