Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

From The Socialist newspaper, 23 May 2018

Victory: how school strike beat 'academy' privatisers

School workers in Newham, east London, stopped Avenue Primary School becoming a privately run 'academy' earlier this month. It took 19 days of determined strike action, starting in November - and saved several other local schools along the way.

The Socialist spoke to Avenue teacher Louise Cuffaro, the Socialist Party member and newly elected National Education Union (NEU) branch secretary who led the borough's campaign.

Louise Cuffaro addressing pickets, Avenue school, 24.4.18, photo James Ivens

Louise Cuffaro addressing pickets, Avenue school, 24.4.18, photo James Ivens   (Click to enlarge)

Why did school workers come out on strike?

School workers are against academisation. They looked to the union to support them.

We discussed it at school level, developed a strategy; we had support from the NEU regional secretary [Socialist Party member Martin Powell-Davies].

We tried, before going on strike, to reach the governors, to say we wanted to put forward our reasons for being against academisation.

We weren't being listened to. We realised it wasn't an open and transparent situation. So we had to have something to bargain with.

We did that by explaining to the parents - but most importantly at Avenue by going immediately for an indicative ballot for strike action.

So it's important to ballot straight away?

Yes, because under NEU rules you need an indicative ballot, followed legally by a postal ballot to members' homes which takes a couple of weeks. If you win you have to give a couple of weeks' notice to the authorities that you're going to strike.

And the legal validity of the ballot only lasts for six months. So we actually had just taken another ballot just before they withdrew the academisation.

So they knew we had again reached the very difficult targets the law gives us. We had a 75% turnout [legal threshold is 50%]. We had 95% in favour of carrying on the action if necessary [legal threshold is 40% of all members, abstentions count against - requiring 53% in this case].

How did you organise to get past these undemocratic obstructions?

Like a military operation. We discussed it at a union meeting. And then we explained that we wanted people to bring their ballot papers in - either already filled in, or come to the union meeting and fill them in. We wanted to check off people's names to know they'd actually voted.

We had four or five reps and active union members who religiously prompted people, "have you done it," ticked off their names when they said they'd voted.

Without doubt, there were some members who didn't feel confident. It's quite a difficult situation for young teachers at the moment who feel their careers are on the line, and training teachers worry management might not pass them so they can't fully qualify.

Some of them hadn't come out. But I can say from the turnout of voting that definitely people who didn't strike voted in favour.

I think that we started out with 25 or 28 union members maximum at Avenue, and because of the strike we've gone up to 76, 77.

What else made the strike successful?

The strike action has to be kept on. We went from one day, to two days pretty quickly, into three-day strikes. I don't think the authority, or the individual schools, took it seriously. They thought it'd go away.

But we made it clear we were serious. Several other schools in the borough were looking at academisation, and when their staff threatened to strike over it, they said 'we don't want an Avenue' and gave in.

Then when we had the three-day strikes we'd always make sure that we were informing the parents. We did many leaflets in multiple languages, which is something they didn't do over academisation at the school itself. [In 2011 the Department for Education found 66% of Newham school students have a first language other than English.]

We explained to them why we were against academisation, and the parents campaigned too. Their fight, of course, was the consultation - or the lack of.

They ended up taking this to judicial review. In the meantime, they understood that we had to strike. They wanted another consultation, and they wanted the management to withdraw from academisation.

Strikers and supporters chanting, Avenue school 24.4.18, photo James Ivens

Strikers and supporters chanting, Avenue school 24.4.18, photo James Ivens   (Click to enlarge)

How did the parents' campaign aid the struggle?

There were growing numbers of parents on our picket lines. They even went door to door in support of the strike.

After we'd done 13 days of strike action, that's when another layer of parents - besides the parents that were already involved and had campaigned really hard over several months - were beginning to be worn out with the strike action.

The school was clearly willing to see the strike action carry on, no matter what it did to the children's education - completely in contrast to what they were saying, which was that we were damaging it.

Of course they were willing to go to academy status no matter what that did to the children's education as well, and it's no surprise that the evidence shows that privatisation isn't good for that.

But it was the next layer of parents who came forward and on the 14th day of strike action, and again on the 15th, occupied the office, demanding that the school come to agreement with the union.

The joint action between the parents and the staff is what, I think, ultimately brought them to the table. The local authority couldn't ignore that school and the governing body wouldn't speak to us.

We held a big open meeting for the parents at the end of April where the union could explain again why we were striking and they could air their frustrations. That meeting passed a resolution which supported the strike and demanded academisation be withdrawn, and that was unanimous.

But the crucial thing is the union group within a school needs to be organised and clear. The parents are very important, and our parents fought long and hard, but the parents can't substitute for the union group.

Once they're organised and understand the issues it's a joint campaign - but it's the strike which applies the decisive pressure.

What support did you get from your Labour councillors and MP?

I have to say the parents did put pressure on their local councillors. They did get them to draft a resolution against academisation. We had to firm it up a bit.

But we also decided to demonstrate when they presented that at the town hall to keep the pressure on. We organised an NEU march, with the parents, from Plashet Park [near the school] to the council on the night the motion was being heard.

Three parents and I went into the council chambers. There was an offshoot, a room with video links, so people on the demonstration could see and hear what was happening.

I feel convinced that affected whether [ousted Blairite] Robin Wales could carry on being the mayor. That forced Labour councillors to at least pay lip service to some kind of fight on something, after years of waving through academisation at other schools and presiding over cuts, as they still do.

But while he was still in, it seemed he was using the undemocratic power he has as a directly elected mayor, behind the scenes, to ignore the position of the council. His replacement, Rokhsana Fiaz, did publicly back the campaign in the end. Now she must prove she really represents something different.

Local Socialist Party members helped keep the pressure on as well. On top of supporting every picket line and campaigning on the streets, several members stood as TUSC candidates against Labour councillors who refused to back the campaign.

The parents did get [former minister under Blair] Stephen Timms, the MP, to a meeting early on. I think we knew far more about government policy on academisation than he did.

He said there was still forced academisation and tried to argue Avenue would have to become an academy anyway - which actually wasn't really true even when it was forced; it was still possible to fight.

He said every school had to become an academy by 2020. We appraised him that wasn't the case.

There was a legal challenge from the parents - what happened with that?

The legal challenge, as far as I know, is still carrying on. Their legal challenge was to the consultative process. They weren't consulted.

There was no translation. The 'consultation' took place at the last minute; they'd been discussing it on the governors' board for two years. Nobody put to them at any point - except the union - the case against academisation. The council, at that point, was stating it had to be 'neutral'!

So there was nothing to look as if they were really consulting. That legal challenge was granted - permission to go to a judicial review in June/July.

And in the permission stage the judge was very clear, and defined what consultation is. From his comments you could tell he was concerned by the survey that had been carried out, where 132 parents voted against academisation; only four parents voted for it.

And the consultant who wrote the report advised the governing body that was a "significant minority" and they didn't need to take any notice of it - because there are about 620 parents, so you can see that a large number didn't vote. They were counting the non-voters as pro-academy!

And this legal challenge bought the strike some breathing space?

The day permission was granted we were on strike and we were at the court with them. And little did we all know, but that hearing was literally the day before the governing body intended to sign the final papers, the financial agreement.

So without that pause that the parents won by getting that judicial review... that was literally at the eleventh hour.

In principle whole thing was already agreed by the council, they agreed the transfer of land long before the pressure from parents and the strike forced them to state they were against it. That would have meant that, in spite of the councillors' resolution, on Sunday 1 April we would have been an academy.

Did the parallel strike at Cumberland School, a Newham secondary, fall foul of these hidden processes?

The shenanigans in the last few weeks - it was not transparent. The union was demanding to see papers because the school was insisting it had to go head, that there was an "order."

There is no 'order' until the final papers are signed. You can retract from it up to the final minute.

Despite members fighting bravely at Cumberland the management went ahead with it. But you have to say - this union group has grown in size, to over 100 members.

And on the day it was announced they had been academised they went into the meeting declaring they remained against academisation, they were a strong union, and were prepared to go on fighting for the rights of their members, their pay and conditions.

What's the next fight?

School staff are already under the cosh because of extreme workload and cuts to pay. The NEU nationally is going to ballot on that and school workers and parents will need to stay organised to win that fight, and where they're not organised they'll need to get organised.

And although we've had the victory of the governing body withdrawing the threat of imminent academisation, in the letter the head says "this time."

We know the crucial thing now is to press the re-elected Labour council to ratify their anti-academy policy and come out with clear statements for how they propose to support schools.

Ordinary people are getting more and more sussed. It's crucial that Labour councillors do what they've been voted for to do, what they promised us ahead of the election and what people understand from Corbyn's anti-austerity manifesto.

Expectations are high. They can't just sit back and say they have no funds. They have to fight for funds.

Newham stands to lose over 1,000 teaching jobs under the government's new funding formula. Councils can license schools to run budget deficits within the law.

They can also use their reserves and borrowing to stop cuts throughout council budgets within the law. Of course, if they end up having to break the law to fight the cuts, the Socialist Party rightly says they shouldn't shy away from that either.

Rokhsana Fiaz replaced Robin Wales as Labour mayor on the promise that she represents a shift to the left. She and her council have a choice: fight alongside school staff and parents, or fight against us. They should set no-cuts budgets now and help build a fight to get the funding we need from the government.

The thing is, we have to carry on fighting. For everybody. And ultimately we'll want the schools that are already academies to come back under local authority control.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.

In The Socialist 23 May 2018:

What we think

Tories prepare for possible snap election

Socialist Party news and analysis

Capitalism's Grenfell shame - Tories must go

Homeless charity colluding to deport homeless!

Youthful enthusiasm to break with repression of past

New Ebola threat

Government continues to back failed private rail

Support refugees rights

France '68

May 1968: 'Communist' leaders hand power back to defeated bosses

Socialist Party workplace news

Victory: how school strike beat 'academy' privatisers

Threat to unity of PCS left

PCS conference votes for strike action

Solid strike at Tesco Dagenham distribution centre forces pay talks

Services disappearing from Harrogate

College staff caught between the devil and the deep blue sea

First ever strike at TGI Fridays

International socialist news and analysis

Yes to the struggle to lift the siege

Tax Amazon movement wins in Seattle

Socialist Party reports and campaigns

Stop Trump! Build for 13 July student walkouts

Student leaders claim one million on the streets against Brexit - fight for a workers' exit

Let's sell 1,000 extra copies of issue 1000!

Leicester socialists fight poverty-paying sweatshops

Sheffield Pride organisers defeated in attempt to ban politics

40 attend Socialist Party housing campaign launch in Windsor

Section 28

30 years on from Section 28: the legacy of fighting LGBT+ attacks must continue


How 'Prevent' training fosters racist paranoia

Ads won't fix it: fight mental health cuts as well as stigma

We can learn about struggle from the mass trespass of Kinder Scout

The Socialist Inbox


Home   |   The Socialist 23 May 2018   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Audio  |   PDF  |   ebook

Related links:


triangleAcademy strike - standing up to 'bullying' management forces climbdown

triangleStriking teachers march against Enfield schools academisation plans

triangleBlairites plan to expand their very own academy chain

triangleSchool students in solitary: for full funding, not exclusion!

triangleWaltham Forest Socialist Party: Building the movement for socialism this autumn


trianglePCS members at BEIS maintain just fightback

triangleNottingham College UCU - more strike action planned

triangleDVSA strike - employer asks for talks


triangleMoney doesn't make up for cuts - education unions must organise for funding and against Tory attacks

triangleIlford: parents and teachers unite against school cuts

triangleJuly climate strikes: link up with the workers' movement


triangleProtest against Send education funding cuts

triangleDay of action against cuts to special needs education


triangleBuilding a new left in PCS


triangleNorthern Ireland: Campaign mounts over historic sexual abuse allegations cover-up


triangleHuge workload, low pay and unpaid hours - a day in the life of a teaching assistant


triangleTrade union movement must put its stamp on swirling events


triangleHackney transport strike - blockade foils employers


triangleSouth Yorkshire FBU celebrates halt to cuts

Socialist Party:

triangleHackney Socialist Party: Socialist change to end climate change


triangleNewham housing repairs workers announce strike dates


triangleIlford: strike forces school management to back down


triangleThe Socialist Inbox


triangleClimate strikes: trade union round-up


triangleFrimley hospital staff fight back-door privatisation


triangleThe Socialist inbox

National Education Union:

triangleCouncil seeks to take budget deficit out on school staff and pupils


triangleBirmingham: Socialist Students winter conference

East London:

triangleEast London Socialist Party: A socialist programme to end women's oppression


triangleLeicester: No-cuts budget only way forward

Martin Powell-Davies:

triangle40 years after Three Mile Island disaster

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns


Socialist Party

Donate to help us move our press by October



Ilford: strike forces school management to back down



PCS members at BEIS maintain just fightback


The Socialist

Selling the Socialist



London: packed public meeting discusses political crisis



Worcestershire campaigners plan march to save Bewdley Fire Station



Strike back to stop bullying Royal Mail bosses


South Yorkshire

South Yorkshire defeats fire cuts



Nottingham College UCU - more strike action planned



DVSA strike - employer asks for talks



PCS general secretary candidate: unions must mobilise to drive out Boris


Climate change

Climate protests: which way forward after 20 September?



Lincolnshire health visitors strike boost


Trade union

South Yorkshire FBU celebrates halt to cuts



Earth strike day in London

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777


Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 0798 202 1969

East Mids: 0773 797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 0784 114 4890

North West 07954 376 096

South East: 020 8988 8777

South West: 07759 796 478

Southern: 07833 681910

Wales: 07935 391 947

West Mids: 02476 555 620

Yorkshire: 0114 264 6551



Alphabetical listing

September 2019

August 2019

July 2019

June 2019

May 2019

April 2019

March 2019

February 2019

January 2019