Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: https://secure.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/29154

Posted on 23 May 2019 at 12:44 GMT

The editorial of the June 2019 issue (no. 229) of Socialism Today
June 2019 issue of Socialism Today

June 2019 issue of Socialism Today   (Click to enlarge)

Warning lights flashing for Corbynism

The promise of the Corbyn insurgency that began in 2015 is in danger. The triumph of the left-wing backbench outsider in the Labour leadership election four years ago opened up the prospect of overturning Tony Blair's 1990s transmutation of the Labour Party into New Labour.

By qualitatively changing Labour from a 'capitalist workers' party' - with pro-capitalist leaders but democratic structures that allowed organised workers to fight for their interests, particularly through the trade unions - working-class political representation had effectively been eliminated as a mass force for over two decades.

Jeremy Corbyn's unexpected victory was a bridgehead from which, potentially, this process could be reversed and workers achieve a mass party of their own.

This potential was reinforced in 2016 by Corbyn's defeat of the leadership coup organised by the still-Blairite dominated Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) and, even more profoundly, the general election surge a year later.

Labour saw the biggest increase in its vote between elections since 1945 with millions inspired by Corbyn's manifesto which, while falling short of the socialist programme needed to end the power of the capitalist class, signalled a break with the austerity consensus of the Tories and the Blairites.

Since then, however, momentum has stalled. The local election results at the beginning of May and the likely outcome of the European parliamentary elections later in the month (after we go to press), with Labour set to be outpolled by Nigel Farage's Brexit Party, are a serious warning.

By not completing the insurgency set in motion in 2015 and transforming Labour ideologically and organisationally into a mass socialist workers' party, a vacuum remains which can be filled by other forces dangerous to the working class.

Message of the May polls

The narrative of the May local elections promoted by the Blairites in the PLP and the liberal media commentariat was that the Liberal Democrats had staged a triumphant recovery because they were the voice of opposition to Brexit.

Labour on the other hand suffered a net loss of 84 councillors because Jeremy Corbyn failed to say that he would reverse the 2016 referendum result. But that is a superficial reading of the facts - and a disastrous political prescription.

The Lib Dems did win an extra 704 councillors compared to the last time these seats were contested in 2015. But having suffered a net loss of 1,159 in this four-yearly cycle of elections while they were participating in the Con-Dem coalition - across the contests of both 2011 and 2015 - it was a limited recovery.

The Lib Dems' projected national share of the vote, calculated by the BBC to take into account that not all councils had elections on 2 May, was 18%, well below their share in any round of council elections between 1993 and 2010.

Nor were their gains more than marginally greater in areas that had voted remain in the EU referendum compared to those that had voted leave. The Liberal Democrats notably won Chelmsford council, for example, by overturning a 45-seat Tory majority in a city where 53% had voted leave in 2016.

The Lib Dems have seemingly acquired momentum ahead of the European elections, the immediate effect of which is to be seen. But the most accurate assessment of the local elections is that they managed to partially regain the position they held before 2010 as a protest receptacle for 'none of the above'.

The Lib Dems were not unchallenged even in that respect, however. The Greens gained an extra 194 councillors and there were more than 900 candidates elected not standing on a party label - a net gain of over 500 - averaging 25% of the vote where they stood.

The leader of the independents on Darlington council, which Labour lost control of for the first time in 28 years, put their rise down to a reaction against Labour councillors who had "stopped listening and become complacent" on local issues.

These were, after all, council elections, with a turnout typically half of that in a general election. That is not to say that there was no correlation between attitudes to Brexit and voting patterns on 2 May, which of course will be even more marked in the 23 May poll.

Labour lost control of Bolsover council, which voted 71% for leave in 2016, Hartlepool (70%), Burnley (67%), Middlesbrough (66%), Stockton-On-Tees (62%), Darlington (56%), and Lancaster (51%).

All of the 21 councils where Labour lost five or more seats were in heavily leave-voting areas.

The vote for leave in 2016 was, at base, a working-class revolt against the capitalist establishment, a shout of rage at the age of austerity and all its consequences that followed the financial crash of 2007-08.

That this is not finding its outlet through the Labour Party after four years of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership is a grave warning to him, the shadow chancellor John McDonnell, and their supporters in the labour movement.

Workers still disenfranchised

Asked what the single most important reason was for why they voted as they did in the EU referendum, Lord Ashcroft's exit poll - taken on the day of the 2016 vote - found that 49% of leave voters said that it was "the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK".

The leave victory was, above all, an expression of the alienation and powerlessness felt by working-class people in the face of remote and uncontrollable forces shaping their workplaces and communities.

Three years later, the Hansard Society's 2019 audit of political engagement found that 47% of adults in the UK still feel that they have no influence at all over national decision-making, the highest level of feeling powerless recorded in the 16-year history of this annual survey.

This is the same study that showed 63% believing that "Britain's system of government is rigged to the advantage of the rich and powerful".

How is it that big sections of the working class can feel so disenfranchised after four years of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership of the Labour Party? Even Labour as a capitalist workers' party in the past was seen by the working class as their party, the means by which they could 'influence decision-making'.

Bringing workers together to struggle and discuss collectively helped develop a broader class consciousness beyond their own particular interests or special oppression, and impelled them to consider how together they could take on 'the rich and powerful'.

It is through organisation, including in a workers' party, that the working class on a mass scale moves from being a class in itself to a class for itself, coming to see the need for an alternative to the 'rigged system' - socialism against capitalism - and its defenders.

The major mistake of the self-declared 'democratic socialist' senator Bernie Sanders not to direct the support he won in his 2016 presidential bid to building a new working-class party meant that a mass socialist class consciousness has not developed as rapidly as it could have done in the US, as Tony Saunois explains in his article on page 14 of Socialism Today [also available on the CWI website], although there are enormous opportunities for it to do so.

Ultimately conciliating instead with the Democratic Party establishment in 2016, unfortunately it is a mistake that Sanders seems set to repeat.

There is not an exact parallel with the Labour Party which was founded by the trade unions while the US Democratic Party has been capitalist since its inception.

But why, despite Jeremy Corbyn's leadership of the Labour Party, has mass consciousness not developed as it should have done here in the past four years? Because the Corbyn insurgency has not been completed either politically, with a clear socialist programme, or organisationally, with workers and their trade unions at the core of a party democratically restructured from top to bottom.

Rescuing the insurgency

Reflecting on the May elections, the Guardian columnist Owen Jones wrote of Labour being "robbed of that sense of insurgency by Brexit" (9 May).

What is necessary, he argued, "is to pick fights with unpopular vested interests, causing almighty public rows which reinforce its 'many' versus 'the few' insurgent appeal".

Jones's solution, however, was just more policy proposals for what a future Corbyn government should do - scrap knighthoods, abolish private schools, a state-backed national estate agency - rather than steps Corbyn could take to change the lived experience, and consciousness, of workers today and to link that to the need for governmental power.

Labour councillors lost seats because they have acted as implementing agents, willing (the Blairites) or not, of Tory austerity measures.

Over 90% of schools in England, for example, are facing a funding shortfall, meaning fewer teachers and support staff, rising class sizes, and shrinking subject choices.

Labour councils could use their licensed deficit powers to underwrite shortfalls, and Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell could pledge to reimburse them on coming to power for all the cuts they prevent. Isn't that a better 'fight to pick'?

Yet four years into their leadership not a single Labour council can be held up as a model of defiance, even when faced with Theresa May's weak and demoralised government. If anything the Blairites have entrenched their grip on local government after a change to Labour's constitution in 2016, without opposition from Corbyn, made it a disciplinary offence for potential rebel councillors to propose allegedly 'illegal' budgets.

Moreover, why should Brexit have necessarily 'robbed' Corbynism of its insurgent character? Corbyn is suffering the consequences of his first concession to the Blairites when, in September 2015, he committed to support a remain vote in the EU referendum in all circumstances.

But there have been opportunities since to demystify Brexit - just another term for renegotiating relations with the 27 member states of the EU bosses' club - and transform the debate.

A pledge that any government he leads would not be bound by the current EU rules on nationalisation, state aid, public-sector procurement, restrictions on workers' collective bargaining rights, etc - and that scrapping them would be the basis on which he would negotiate a new deal - would undercut the propaganda of both the right-wing Brexiteers and Blairite remainers.

Combined with a call to scrap the EU fiscal compact commitments to continental austerity, write-off the eurozone debts, and create a common economic area based on public ownership of the banks and major monopolies, Corbynism could become an insurgent force across Europe, too.

A clear commitment now that he would accept a request for an Article 30 order for a Scottish independence referendum (see article on page seven of Socialism Today) would be another vital step to building international support. It would show that a Corbyn-led government would recognise in practice the right of self-determination in Europe and elsewhere.

In addition, Jeremy Corbyn could present his own proposals for a democratic reconstitution of the Labour Party, including mandatory reselection of MPs and restoring the trade unions' rights of collective representation in the formation of policy, the selection of candidates, and the governance of the party locally and nationally.

Also vital to ensuring the necessary discussion and clarification of policies and ideas would be the right for all socialists, including those previously expelled or excluded such as the Socialist Party (formerly Militant), to organise within the party in a modern version of Labour's founding federal structure.

At every stage, however, the same obstacle looms - Corbyn's determination to conciliate rather than break with the Blairite representatives of capitalism still dominant in the PLP, the local council chambers, and significant sections of the party machinery.

The struggle for independent-working class political representation is an ever-more urgent task for every labour movement militant, young climate striker or social movement activist.

To rescue the promise of Corbynism it cannot continue to coexist in one party with the pro-capitalist right.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.






Related links:

Labour:

triangleEdmonton joins Enfield North Labour in supporting 'no cuts' fightback strategy

triangleGrenfell two years on - Still fighting for safety and justice

triangleNeglected Newham tenants demand action

triangleCorbyn must go on the offensive against the Labour right

Workers:

triangleWales NSSN: Support the Ford Bridgend workers - No Closure

triangleTory drug hypocrisy

triangleNigeria: Stop police harassment of Abbey and Azeez!

triangleScottish airport strikes - fight for better pay and pensions

Elections:

triangleSocialists in Unison hold positions in elections

triangleSouthern Ireland elections

triangleEuro elections 2019 - Across Europe

Council:

triangleTerrible child murders linked to cuts

triangleSocialist Party members make big impact at trades council conference

Jeremy Corbyn:

triangleTens of thousands march

Capitalist:

triangleBosses fear revolt against capitalism

EU:

triangleThem & us

Brexit:

triangleEuro-elections in Scotland and Wales

Councillors:

triangleHome carers victory

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis

12/6/19

Ford

Nationalise Ford to prevent closure

12/6/19

Grenfell Tower

Grenfell two years on - Still fighting for safety and justice

12/6/19

Cuts

Terrible child murders linked to cuts

12/6/19

Homophobia

Widespread condemnation of horrifying, violent, homophobic assaults

12/6/19

Tories

Tory drug hypocrisy

5/6/19

Socialist

Corbyn must go on the offensive against the Labour right

5/6/19

Them & Us

Them & Us

5/6/19

Pay

Laughable research denies low-pay scandal

5/6/19

Tuition Fees

Theresa May admits tuition fees system is broken - but plans new attacks on students

5/6/19

NHS

Reverse the GP cuts

5/6/19

Tories

Tories deny dire poverty ...look around you! Boot out the Tories

29/5/19

Tories

Tories smashed in Euros - Now get them out

29/5/19

Them & Us

Them & us

29/5/19

Austerity

Blistering UN report condemns Tory austerity - workers' action can end it

23/5/19

Labour

Warning lights flashing for Corbynism

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 0798 202 1969

East Mids: 0773 797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 0784 114 4890

North West 07769 611 320

South East: 020 8988 8777

South West: 07759 796 478

Southern: 07833 681910

Wales: 07935 391 947

West Mids: 02476 555 620

Yorkshire: 0114 264 6551

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


June 2019

May 2019

April 2019

March 2019

February 2019

January 2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999