Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: https://secure.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/188/8061

From The Socialist newspaper, 12 January 2001

Hackney debate: How to take the dispute forward

We have received a letter from John Page, branch secretary of Hackney Unison, taking up points made by Bill Mullins concerning the role of the negotiating committee of Hackney UNISON in the current dispute. We reprint John's letter, and below it we carry Bill Mullin's reply.

Can I take this opportunity to thank all Socialist Party members who have worked with the trade unions in Hackney to build our fight against the council's disgraceful cuts package. I am also grateful for the supportive coverage in your newspaper.

I must however correct a glaring inaccuracy in Bill Mullins' strike report. Bill claims that "already the negotiators have accepted that they will negotiate on the implementation of lower terms and conditions".

As a member of that negotiating committee I am angered at the inaccuracy of Bill's report. The negotiating committee meet weekly with management, and there are further meetings of sub groups. These include a working group on life-and-limb cover for strike days, (convened at our insistence) and a group attempting to force the council to lift redundancy notices that have been unlawfully served on our members.

Written reports of these meetings are distributed to our members who have overwhelmingly approved the approach taken by our negotiating team.

Our position is simple, we will meet with management at any time to discuss any proposals they have, however unpalatable. Bill seems to have confused meeting with management with accepting from management.

Management do not want to meet with us, but have been forced to. It would be wholly counter-productive for us to let management off the hook by refusing to meet and explore their proposals.

We will use any opportunity at our disposal, including the threat of legal action. It is precisely because our members believe that we have been prepared to use every possible avenue, that they have had the confidence to vote for and then take strike action.

There will be further strike action in Hackney, and we have already built an impressive alliance between council workers and residents.

Despite our role in negotiations, we have consistently told our members that this dispute will be won or lost through industrial action. Bill appears to have brought a pre-concieved formula to his interpretation of this dispute.

His misguided comments can only undermine confidence, by creating the suspicion that there is something that our members are not being told.

Yours fraternally,
John Page
Unison Branch Secretary, Hackney.

Bill Mullins replies:

The Socialist welcomes John Page's letter. Where we make mistakes we have no problem in correcting them.

John is wrong however when he says that "I have a preconceived formula regarding this dispute" or that I have assumed that the dispute "is going to lose and wants a ready-made political critique in advance". Nothing could be further from the truth.

John accepts our members have played a key role both as UNISON branch officers and as Hackney tenants in building this dispute. Indeed, our own members' livelihoods are on the line. We have only one interest and that is ensuring the dispute's success.

My concern regarding the negotiators' position was based on a letter written to chief executive Max Caller by Jim Flood, Secretary of the negotiating team, that the unions were willing "to reaffirm our commitment to negotiation on the local implementation of single status."

The national and provisional agreements (including the single status agreement) are a minimum set of terms and conditions. Hackney workers enjoy conditions over and above these. If the council agreed to apply the national agreement this would mean widespread cuts in their pay and conditions.

Max Caller has made it clear that this is what he wants. I think it is incumbent in a letter from trade unions to the management, that inevitably becomes a public document, to make it clear that the unions are not prepared to go down this road.

Jim Flood's letter, unfortunately, gives the impression that the union side is prepared to make concessions to the employers.

John says that there was no such intention and that they are relying on a "protection" clause in the agreement which protects local terms and conditions, which are better than the national agreement.

But the letter did not say this. John says this was for tactical reasons to attempt to at least bring management into negotiations. If that were the case then he might have a point, but it is clear that some on the trade union negotiating body are prepared to make concessions.

If that was not the case why is there opposition to the idea of democratic control over negotiations. Why did John himself not support the resolution to the UNISON branch committee proposed by Brian Debus, the chairman, calling for democratic accountability?

Donate to the Socialist Party

Coronavirus crisis - Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

  • The Socialist Party's material is more vital than ever, so we can continue to report from workers who are fighting for better health and safety measures, against layoffs, for adequate staffing levels, etc.
  • Our 'fighting coronavirus workers' charter', outlines a programme to combat the virus and protect workers' living conditions.
  • When the health crisis subsides, we must be ready for the stormy events ahead and the need to arm workers' movements with a socialist programme - one which puts the health and needs of humanity before the profits of a few.
Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.
We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to donate to our special coronavirus appeal.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation

 

Your message: 

 


In The Socialist 12 January 2001:

Exposed: Labour's Election Hype

Students worse off under Labour

Now the Party's Over

Hackney: stand up to these attacks

Hackney debate: How to take the dispute forward

Fight for all Vauxhall jobs

Import controls no solution

He who pays the piper...

Thousands rally in support of Czech TV workers


 

Home   |   The Socialist 12 January 2001   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Hackney:

triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: Tories in Crisis

triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: Covid Schools + Tories = Chaos

triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: Chile - 50th anniversary of the election of the Popular Unity alliance

triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: The trade unions today

triangleSick pay victory at Homerton hospital!

Unison:

triangleReinstate Tony Smith

triangleA critical election for Unison general secretary

triangleHugo Pierre for Unison general secretary

triangleTower Hamlets council workers strike against wholesale attack on terms and conditions

Council:

triangleNottingham City Council: The (mis)adventures of Robin Hood Energy

triangleGrenfell fire inquiry stops victims attending

triangleCaerphilly lockdown puts profits before safety

Strike:

triangleLondon bus drivers begin strike ballot over remote sign-on dispute

triangleTate workers on indefinite strike hold march and rally

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

16/9/20

The Socialist

Selling the Socialist

16/9/20

Socialist Party

Why I joined the Socialist Party: Tories and Blairites only care about corporate greed

16/9/20

Young people

Covid generation says 'fund our future'

16/9/20

Coventry

Coventry: scrap 'profit before people' hospital parking charges

16/9/20

NHS

Angry health workers demand 15% now!

16/9/20

Usdaw

Reinstate Richie Venton

16/9/20

Hull

Reinstate Tony Smith

16/9/20

Strike

Tate workers on indefinite strike hold march and rally

16/9/20

London

London bus drivers begin strike ballot over remote sign-on dispute

16/9/20

Ireland

Ireland: Debenham's occupier speaks out

16/9/20

PCS

PCS members in DWP reject unsafe extension of hours

16/9/20

National Shop Stewards Network

National Shop Stewards Network lobbying for a lead from the TUC

16/9/20

Socialist Party

Two weeks to donate: we need your help

9/9/20

Black Lives Matter

BLM: Socialist alternative to racist capitalism

9/9/20

Amazon

Fight Amazon's anti-union spies

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 075 4018 9052

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


September 2020

August 2020

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999