Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: https://secure.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/188/8061

From The Socialist newspaper, 12 January 2001

Hackney debate: How to take the dispute forward

We have received a letter from John Page, branch secretary of Hackney Unison, taking up points made by Bill Mullins concerning the role of the negotiating committee of Hackney UNISON in the current dispute. We reprint John's letter, and below it we carry Bill Mullin's reply.

Can I take this opportunity to thank all Socialist Party members who have worked with the trade unions in Hackney to build our fight against the council's disgraceful cuts package. I am also grateful for the supportive coverage in your newspaper.

I must however correct a glaring inaccuracy in Bill Mullins' strike report. Bill claims that "already the negotiators have accepted that they will negotiate on the implementation of lower terms and conditions".

As a member of that negotiating committee I am angered at the inaccuracy of Bill's report. The negotiating committee meet weekly with management, and there are further meetings of sub groups. These include a working group on life-and-limb cover for strike days, (convened at our insistence) and a group attempting to force the council to lift redundancy notices that have been unlawfully served on our members.

Written reports of these meetings are distributed to our members who have overwhelmingly approved the approach taken by our negotiating team.

Our position is simple, we will meet with management at any time to discuss any proposals they have, however unpalatable. Bill seems to have confused meeting with management with accepting from management.

Management do not want to meet with us, but have been forced to. It would be wholly counter-productive for us to let management off the hook by refusing to meet and explore their proposals.

We will use any opportunity at our disposal, including the threat of legal action. It is precisely because our members believe that we have been prepared to use every possible avenue, that they have had the confidence to vote for and then take strike action.

There will be further strike action in Hackney, and we have already built an impressive alliance between council workers and residents.

Despite our role in negotiations, we have consistently told our members that this dispute will be won or lost through industrial action. Bill appears to have brought a pre-concieved formula to his interpretation of this dispute.

His misguided comments can only undermine confidence, by creating the suspicion that there is something that our members are not being told.

Yours fraternally,
John Page
Unison Branch Secretary, Hackney.

Bill Mullins replies:

The Socialist welcomes John Page's letter. Where we make mistakes we have no problem in correcting them.

John is wrong however when he says that "I have a preconceived formula regarding this dispute" or that I have assumed that the dispute "is going to lose and wants a ready-made political critique in advance". Nothing could be further from the truth.

John accepts our members have played a key role both as UNISON branch officers and as Hackney tenants in building this dispute. Indeed, our own members' livelihoods are on the line. We have only one interest and that is ensuring the dispute's success.

My concern regarding the negotiators' position was based on a letter written to chief executive Max Caller by Jim Flood, Secretary of the negotiating team, that the unions were willing "to reaffirm our commitment to negotiation on the local implementation of single status."

The national and provisional agreements (including the single status agreement) are a minimum set of terms and conditions. Hackney workers enjoy conditions over and above these. If the council agreed to apply the national agreement this would mean widespread cuts in their pay and conditions.

Max Caller has made it clear that this is what he wants. I think it is incumbent in a letter from trade unions to the management, that inevitably becomes a public document, to make it clear that the unions are not prepared to go down this road.

Jim Flood's letter, unfortunately, gives the impression that the union side is prepared to make concessions to the employers.

John says that there was no such intention and that they are relying on a "protection" clause in the agreement which protects local terms and conditions, which are better than the national agreement.

But the letter did not say this. John says this was for tactical reasons to attempt to at least bring management into negotiations. If that were the case then he might have a point, but it is clear that some on the trade union negotiating body are prepared to make concessions.

If that was not the case why is there opposition to the idea of democratic control over negotiations. Why did John himself not support the resolution to the UNISON branch committee proposed by Brian Debus, the chairman, calling for democratic accountability?

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 12 January 2001:

Exposed: Labour's Election Hype

Students worse off under Labour

Now the Party's Over

Hackney: stand up to these attacks

Hackney debate: How to take the dispute forward

Fight for all Vauxhall jobs

Import controls no solution

He who pays the piper...

Thousands rally in support of Czech TV workers


 

Home   |   The Socialist 12 January 2001   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Hackney:

triangleHackney Socialist Party: Can guerrilla struggles achieve socialism?

triangleHackney school bus workers win pay increase following strikes

triangleHackney Socialist Party: After the election - Britains uncharted waters

triangleHackney Socialist Party: World in revolt against capitalism

triangleHackney Socialist Party: What will the election result mean for 2020?

Unison:

triangleReverse Unison's undemocratic nomination of Blairite Starmer

triangleUnison national executive members challenge validity of nomination for Keir Starmer for leader of the Labour Party

triangleCouncil concedes to striking winter gritters' demands

triangleWorkplace news in brief

Council:

triangleStop gentrification in Newham: "We are here, you have consulted us and we're not going anywhere!"

triangleAvenue of trees saved!

triangleUndervalued gritters to walk out

Strike:

triangleFrench workers demonstrating in Paris on Thursday 16 January; Now over 40 days of strike action have taken place against the government's attacks on pensions. Photo James Ivens

triangleWestex Carpet strike reaches two month mark

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

15/1/20

Young people

Young people who voted for Corbyn's manifesto will now ask... How can we win those ideas?

15/1/20

Scotland

Massive Scottish independence demo marks new stage in struggle

15/1/20

London

London: Protesters return to oppose Middle East war

15/1/20

Government

Cladding scandal: Government steps up defence of landlords

15/1/20

Nottingham

Nottingham: Youth protest against Barclays 64 million fossil-fuel investments

15/1/20

Strike

Westex Carpet strike reaches two month mark

15/1/20

Newham

Stop gentrification in Newham: "We are here, you have consulted us and we're not going anywhere!"

15/1/20

Socialist Party

Socialist Party national committee meeting

15/1/20

Hackney

Hackney school bus workers win pay increase following strikes

15/1/20

Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland: Thousands of nurses continue to strike for better pay

15/1/20

Buses

London bus drivers ballot to strike

15/1/20

PCS

PCS: Time to rebuild the left

15/1/20

Union

Union lawyer arrested on security guards' picket line

9/1/20

Unison

Unison national executive members challenge validity of nomination for Keir Starmer for leader of the Labour Party

8/1/20

Unions

Build union resistance to Tory attacks

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


January 2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999