spotCampaigns

spotOrganisations

spotArguments for socialism

spotPeople

spotInternational

spotEvents

spotAround the UK


All keywords


All Arguments for socialism subcategories:

Arguments for socialism

* Capitalism

Globalisation Anticapitalism

Marxism


Capitalism keywords:

1929 (4)

Asset-stripping (9)

Austerity (1327)

Bankers (116)

Banking crisis (15)

Bear Stearns (3)

Blairite (25)

Bonuses (62)

Bourgeois (4)

Brexit (225)

British economy (20)

British politics (10)

Budget (369)

Capitalism (1012)

Capitalist (732)

Carry trade (1)

Coalition government (27)

Competition (31)

Credit crunch (20)

Debt (232)

Depression (22)

Economic crisis (98)

Economy (468)

Enron (2)

Euro (44)

Famine (2)

Great Depression (7)

Hedge funds (10)

Import controls (1)

Inflation (42)

Interest rates (28)

Jpmorgan (1)

Keynesian (8)

Keynesianism (4)

Lisbon Treaty (10)

Marriage (9)

Mortgages (21)

Northern Rock (34)

Oil (296)

Oppression (72)

Populism (8)

Private equity (11)

Profit (111)

Profit system (32)

Recession (126)

Rich (265)

Shares (19)

Shell (9)

Short-selling (2)

Social class (3)

Software (3)

Stock market (11)

Stock market crash (3)

Sub-prime (12)

Sub-prime market (2)

Subprime (10)

Tax (614)

Technology (34)

Universal Credit (62)

Wealth (83)

Wealth gap (15)

World economy (57)

capitalist crisis (36)

capitalist system (42)

Tax


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article
From: The Socialist issue 1019, 21 November 2018: Tories out - general election now!

Search site for keywords: Retail - Public ownership - Workers - Usdaw - Tax - Minimum wage - Zero-hour contracts

Save the high street: public ownership, not ghost malls

Shops are deserting Britain's high streets - taking jobs with them, photo by Beata May/CC

Shops are deserting Britain's high streets - taking jobs with them, photo by Beata May/CC   (Click to enlarge)

Iain Dalton, chair, Usdaw Broad Left

This year has been a bad year for the retail sector. About 14 shops are closing a day, a net loss of 1,123 from Britain's main high streets in the first half of this year, according to accountants PwC.

Squeezed incomes, reduced free time, transport difficulties and lower effective tax rates for online retailers have all hit the high street hard. So it was hardly surprising that Tory chancellor Phillip Hammond made a great play of being its rescuer in the recent budget, pledging £1.5 billion.

This allocated £900 million for business rates relief - tax cuts for small retailers, meaning those with a 'rateable value' under £51,000.

But it's the big chains that are responsible for the bulk of store closures and workers out of a job.

Big retailers could benefit from the rest of the sum, allocated to a 'transformation fund' for the high street. This is supposed to be used for renovations and 'small-scale transport infrastructure'. However, the Tories will not disburse this according to the needs of retail workers and local communities, but instead to suit the needs of bosses and property owners.

Usdaw

In contrast to this, retail workers' union Usdaw recently launched its 'Industrial Strategy for Retail'. This includes some welcome measures: a £10-an-hour minimum wage, minimum 16-hour contracts and the right to a contract reflecting regular hours worked. Also, reducing the gap between chief executive pay and ordinary workers, and measures to stop corporate tax avoidance.

The strategy supports Labour's pledge to introduce free bus travel for under-25s. It calls for removing the loophole allowing employers to avoid collective consultations when closing sites with less than 20 staff.

But it falls short of asking a central question: under whose control is the retail industry to be developed, and in whose interests?

Usdaw's 2017 conference resolved that failing retail companies should not to be allowed to sack workers and close stores, but be brought into public ownership instead. Usdaw should make this a cornerstone of its industrial strategy for retail.

Instead of handouts to private equity firms owning shopping centres, why not nationalise them, with compensation paid only on the basis of proven need?

Instead of the further corporatisation of the high street, why not allow democratically elected committees of high street workers and the local community to decide what changes they feel are necessary?

They could decide rents and rates democratically. They could decide if and how surplus retail space should be converted to provide some other use which protects jobs, like community centres. In fact, this could begin immediately where Labour-controlled local authorities own shopping centres.

Only on the basis of empowering ordinary workers to control our communities and workplaces can we avoid the fate of the 'ghost malls' and 'ghost towns' that haunt the US.

We say:







Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


February 2020

January 2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999