spotArguments for socialism




spotAround the UK

All keywords

All People subcategories:


* International figures

Labour Party figures




Other UK politicans

Socialist Party and CWI public figures

Tory figures

Trade union figures


Writers and artists

International figures keywords:

Ahmadinejad (15)

Al Gore (4)

Alan Greenspan (3)

Albert Einstein (2)

Alistair Darling (13)

Ariel Sharon (24)

Ariel Sharon (24)

Avigdor Liberman (1)

Babeuf (2)

Bashar al-Assad (7)

Bashar al-Assad (7)

Benazir Bhutto (3)

Benito Mussolini (1)

Berlusconi (21)

Bertie Ahern (3)

Boris Yeltsin (2)

Charles Darwin (2)

Che Guevara (21)

Cindy Sheehan (8)

Daniel Ortega (3)

David Kelly (4)

Dmitry Medvedev (2)

Donald Trump (65)

Ehud Barak (1)

Eleanor Marx (19)

Fidel Castro (11)

Gaddafi (19)

General Franco (1)

General Suharto (1)

George Best (1)

George Bush (81)

Hilary Clinton (4)

Hitler (22)

Hosni Mubarak (8)

Hugo Chávez (32)

Jacob Zuma (9)

Jacques Chirac (4)

Jean Bertrand Aristide (2)

Jean-Marie Le Pen (3)

Jeff Bezos (5)

John Maynard Keynes (2)

Joseph McCarthy (2)

Junichiro Koizumi (1)

Karl Liebknecht (6)

Lenin (68)

Lula (23)

Mahinda Rajapaksa (10)

Mahmood Abbas (2)

Malcolm X (33)

Mao Zedong (5)

Marine Le Pen (7)

Mikhail Gorbachev (4)

Mugabe (11)

Mussolini (4)

Napoleon Bonaparte (2)

Nicolas Sarkozy (7)

Obama (66)

Osama Bin Laden (2)

Paul Krugman (4)

Paul Wolfowitz (1)

Pervez Musharraf (7)

Pinochet (19)

Pope John Paul II (1)

Recep Tayyip Erdogan (2)

Richard Branson (14)

Robespierre (5)

Romano Prodi (4)

Ronald Reagan (2)

Rosa Luxemburg (21)

Rupert Murdoch (27)

Saddam Hussein (30)

Sarkozy (16)

Silvio Berlusconi (4)

Stalin (44)

Thabo Mbeki (2)

Tim Flannery (1)

Tony Blair (152)

Trotsky (136)

Trump (150)

Vladimir Putin (18)

Yasser Arafat (8)


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article
From: The Socialist issue 1048, 26 June 2019: No to Boris, no to Hunt: general election now

Search site for keywords: Iran - US - Imperialism - Trump - Middle East

Ratcheting up of Iran-US tensions

Neither imperialism nor regional powers offer a way forward for region's workers and poor

Donald Trump signs presidential order imposing sanctions on Iran, photo Shealah Craighead/CC

Donald Trump signs presidential order imposing sanctions on Iran, photo Shealah Craighead/CC   (Click to enlarge)

Robert Bechert, Committee for a Workers' International (CWI)

The apparent last minute cancellation by Donald Trump of US military retaliation - after Iran shot down a US surveillance drone - has not significantly lessened the chances of new military clashes given the continuing tensions in that region.

This is particularly true as the drone incident followed explosions on four oil tankers in the Gulf region earlier in June.

Given that the Middle East remains a cockpit of competing world and regional powers each with their own agendas, new clashes - possibly turning into a wider conflict - cannot be ruled out.

At the same time Trump's claimed personal U-turn of calling off direct military action actually graphically illustrated the conflicts both within and between the US state machine and the cabal around Trump.

Trump's decision last year to break with the other main imperialist powers and withdraw from the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran opened a new stage.

However, while opposed by sections of the US ruling class, this move was not simply Trump's personal decision.

For one wing of the US ruling class it was both aimed at rebuilding US imperialism's position in the region especially after its failure at regime change in Syria.

And, linked to that, an attempt to work with the US's closest allies in the region - Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt and Israel - to reverse the increase in regional power and influence the Iranian regime has recently enjoyed.

Following the 1979 overthrow of the regime of their ally, Iran's then autocratic ruler the Shah, the western powers worked to limit Iranian influence.

This was because the new Iranian regime was seen as a threat to their remaining Middle East allies.

Thus Iraq's then dictator Saddam Hussein had the support of most western powers in the bloody 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war.

But then the western powers fell out with Saddam after his 1990 invasion of Kuwait. When this was followed by the second gulf war in 2003 - in which the US-led coalition invaded Iraq, overthrew Saddam and disintegrated the old Iraqi state - the Iranian regime was able to significantly expand its regional reach.


Alongside this development there was division and rivalries among the imperialist powers. Some like China and Russia clearly leaned towards supporting Iran as part of their strategic competition with the western imperialists.

The complexities of the situation helped produce divisions within the US ruling class with some, especially Obama, sharing a similar position to that of most European ruling classes of trying to 'engage' and work with the Iranian regime.

Others in the US, particularly Republicans like John Bolton, currently Trump's National Security Advisor, rejected this, calling for the military overthrow of the Tehran regime.

However large sections of the US military leadership are currently reluctant to undertake a new military adventure which, in their minds, would not lead to a quick, if any, military victory.

While Trump's repeated emphasis that Iran "can't have a nuclear weapon" will have support within the US and some neighbouring countries like Israel and Saudi Arabia, it is not clear whether that would at this time outweigh opposition to military strikes, let alone a new war.

But such military action would not simply have huge implications in the region, it would also have worldwide economic repercussions as the oil price would probably, at least for a time, sharply rise.

Trump's contradictory statements in recent days reflect these divisions in civilian and military US ruling circles.

On the one hand Trump has warned Iran, a country of nearly 83 million, of "obliteration like you've never seen before", while also talking of wanting to help to "make Iran great again".

Partly this is Trump's negotiating strategy, including a clumsy attempt to take advantage of divisions within the Iranian regime.

Within Iran the failure of the 2015 deal to open the door to sustained economic development has weakened Iranian president Hassan Rouhani.

And now the brutal sanctions which the US administration has imposed have deepened an economic crisis.

In the year to March 2019 Iran's GDP (total output) fell by 4.9%. Inflation is currently officially running at just over 50% a year at a time when wages are often not being paid on time.

Significantly this is taking placed against background of an important revival of workers' struggles and oppositional activities since the end of 2017.

Workers in both the private and public sectors have taken to the streets in their thousands and gone on strike on different issues including regular payment of wages, skyrocketing living costs and poor working conditions.

But these movements have not simply been on immediate economic issues. The Haft-Tapeh sugar cane agro-industry workers have become known for having formed an independent workers' council, with its call for the workers' control of their privatised workplace.


As a result the workers have faced repeated repression and arrests. Last year the regime also targeted left-wing students.

Since the 2018 May Day, Amnesty International recorded the arrests of hundreds of workers and other activists.

Courts have handed down harsh prison sentences to dozens of workers. Around 45 workers have been imprisoned since May Day 2019.

These are very significant developments as they pose the possibility that the coming period, despite the regime's repression, could see important progress being made in the building of an independent workers' movement.

Such a development would strike fear not just in the Iranian regime but also in neighbouring countries.

Currently the Iranian working class is, probably alongside its Turkish brothers and sisters, potentially one of the strongest in the region and if it became a politically independent factor it could begin to inspire challenge not just to the various dictatorial regimes but also to capitalism itself.

Clearly this is one factor in Trump making his offer to "make Iran great again", in an attempt to try to exploit opposition against the regime and also to try to head it in a pro-capitalist direction. However, Trump's appeal will probably have limited support.

While there may be some illusions in the US providing a 'better life', there is also the historical legacy of the nationalist anger in Iran at its history of imperialist intervention, especially by the US and Britain.

After the bitter experience of the 2003 Gulf War, opposition to any new imperialist attacks on Iran will be widespread.

But it will need to be linked to solidarity and support to those working to build workers movements in Iran and other Middle Eastern countries.

Only through the creation of independent workers' organisations, armed with socialist policies, can the working class and the poor organise themselves to put to an end the rule of the feudal oligarchs and capitalists. Without this, the region will be faced with the continuation of wars and oppression.

Donate to the Socialist Party

Coronavirus crisis - Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

  • The Socialist Party's material is more vital than ever, so we can continue to report from workers who are fighting for better health and safety measures, against layoffs, for adequate staffing levels, etc.
  • Our 'fighting coronavirus workers' charter', outlines a programme to combat the virus and protect workers' living conditions.
  • When the health crisis subsides, we must be ready for the stormy events ahead and the need to arm workers' movements with a socialist programme - one which puts the health and needs of humanity before the profits of a few.
Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.
We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to donate to our special coronavirus appeal.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation £


Your message: 


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777


Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 075 4018 9052

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041



Alphabetical listing

August 2020

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020